Friday, December 10, 2010

Blog Posts and Explanations!

Summary vs. Analysis, "The Ghost Soilders" by Tim O'Brien

Summary

The chapter entitled “The Ghost Soldiers” from the book “The Things They Carried” by Tim O’Brien is about revenge. This is clearly the motive behind the entire chapter. First the author tells us what caused him to want revenge. He talks about the incident of being shot and not being tended to until he was almost dead. The new medic messed up and that is who he wanted to gain revenge against. The setting of this story takes place in Vietnam at a resupply post for the US Army. The character, Tim, was sent there after being shot twice and pulled by the army from the war front. Throughout the chapters the characters are pretty much all the same, with the exception of one new face. He is the medic responsible for the near death of Tim and his name is Bobby Jorgenson.

The chapter plays out with telling the reader how everything unfolded. We read the story from Tim’s point of view and he talks about how he was shot, the first time and the second time. He talks about how the new medic almost didn’t save his life. Tim also tells us, how he doesn’t really like being on the safe base and how he has been called names because of his wound to his buttocks. The chapter tells about his plans to strike back and gain his revenge and he does so very tactfully one night while the medic is on night guard duty. He plays tricks on him in the night, feeling sad that he is doing it but satisfied and after the night is all over with, Bobby and Tim make a truce; the score is finally settled.

Analysis

A certain chapter inside the book “The Things They Carried” by Tim O’Brien opens up a discussion about human morals and ethics; the author is conveying how hard it is to forgive and forget. When the main character in the book, Tim, is shot in the line of duty, he expects his medic to be there to help him. He cries out for a medic yet almost dies because of the medic’s inability to conquer his fears. We can see that clearly human morals are the topic of this chapter because the author conveys it to us through his language and word choice. Tim wants to forgive the medic, but he can’t because he hates him and that is where the exploring of the human heart begins. We see from these passages the battle that is fought inside the character’s head. First we see the hate forming with this passage, “But it made me hate Bobby Jorgenson the way some guys hated the VC, gut hate, the kind of hate that stays with you even in your dreams” (O’Brien, 182) Obviously, going against human moral to hate so much, but it was only present for a while because over time O’Brien started to struggle over these feelings as we can see here, “Granted, I didn’t hate him anymore, and I’d lost some of the outrage and passion, but the need for revenge kept eating at me” (O’Brien, 192) The hate is gone, but the revenge is still there or the need for it. You can see just from these two passages how emotions switch and how this story is really about morals.

Explanation:

The reason I loved this post was because it really let me dive into what is summary and what is analysis. I got to really take one piece of work and divide it into those two parts. It helped me expand my knowledge on the two different types of writing. I was really pleased with myself when this blog post was done.

My Response to two “Poetry of Witness,” poems

This blog post was supposed to reflect our feelings about two poems from the poetry of witness section on the blackboard site. It was hard to pick two, because they were all so emotionally charged and engaging. The first poem that really struck me from this list was "Charlie Howard's Decent" by Mark Doty. It brought out a lot of emotions for me, and made me upset at the fact that people have to go so far as to kill someone before something is done to protect people who are different. Upon my first reading of this poem, I got the feeling that it was about a disfigured man, who might have been mentally slow. It was not until I did a bit of research on this poem that I found out it was a poem based off true events. It happened in Bangor, Maine. The man, Charlie Howard, was actually a homosexual who was very open and flamboyant. He was made fun of every day. After realizing what this poem was really about, it took on new life for me. I don't support homosexually, but I don't support people who make fun of others that live that lifestyle and I definitely don't support people who murder others because they are different (whether they meant to or not). That being said, this poem has a lot of emotion tied into it. One strong example that brings out an emotion reaction from me was when Doty used this line, "Over and over he slipped into the gulf/between what he knew and how he was known/What others wanted opened like an abyss: the laughing stock-clerks at the grocery/Women at the luncheonette amused by his gestures," (lines 4-7). I got the sense that he was made fun of pretty much everywhere he went, no matter where it was. Sad to think that someone would be tortured that bad.

In one of the other, "Poetry of Witness," poems, the poet Nicole Cooley talks about New Orleans. The emotion that is emitted from this piece of work actually comes from the images painted in our heads after we read the poem. It paints a vivid image of what New Orleans looked like both while the water was high and after the water receded. There are quotes like, "and lace valances from a Lakeview kitchen, where water rose six feet high inside," (Cooley line 8) and, "and a refrigerator wrapped in duct tape lying in the dirt of a once-yard" (Cooley line 9). This is where I get the picture painted. I can see every house underwater, and after the water goes away, I can just see piles of junk lying around, the whole town destroyed. It's from these vivid images that the emotion of grief is provoked from me. This definitely was a sad day for a lot of people.

Explaination:

I choose this as my second blog post because I loved reading and learning about poetry. This was one of the most challenging portions of this class but also the most rewarding. I felt like I advanced as a critical thinker in this part of the class being able to take apart such delicate pieces of work! I was proud of myself for this!

Response to “The Necessity to Speak” by Sam Hamill

The essay by Sam Hamill entitled "The Necessity to Speak", is completely full of emotion and hard hitting facts. I never knew some of these facts until I read this essay. I agree with him on many points that he makes in his essay. I also disagree with some of his points. What I really agree with is the fact that women are disrespected and battered in this country, that equality is still not on the level it should be. Women can be just as valuable as men, and it sickens me when they are treated as inferior. I love that he just comes right out and speaks about it openly, where many can't speak about it. Even after he experienced being raped and battered, and being the batterer, the way he can speak up about such issues with conviction and control is commendable.

I love his stance on abortion and the killing of unborn babies. I agree whole-heartedly with the fact that he refers to them as unborn children, as living creatures not just a fetus. I also agree with the fact that parents need to be more active in the parenting of their children, talking to and educating them about sex. If parents sat down and talked to their kids about this, it would reduce the amount of teenage pregnancies, which would reduce the amount of abortions in this country. Mr. Hamill hit it right on the head when he talked about how a girl who hasn't been properly educated in sex and love can easily fall in love with a batterer. Mr. Hamill goes on and talks about what the kids learn in the home they will carry on with them through life. If they see battering in the house, they will grow up to be battered (because that is the life they know and are drawn to) or they will grow up to be a batterer (because that is all they know how to do).

The facts that I don't agree with Mr. Hamill on is spanking of children. I was spanked growing up, and there is a fine line between spanking and abuse. If you are leaving marks on your child, if you are making them bleed, and leaving them to cry, you are abusing them. If you are spanking them, leaving no physical damage on their body, and you explain in full why they are experiencing that pain, they can learn and grow from it as I did. I turned out very well, and I know the difference. The reason some people are against spanking is because they have only experienced or they only know about abuse. It saddens me to see anyone go through abuse, and reading this essay really makes me remember the stories my mom told me about her childhood and the sexual and emotional abuse she suffered.

Relating this essay to the poems we were required to read this week can be easily done. In some of those poems, namely "Charlie Howard's Descent", you can feel the pain in that poem and relate it to physical and emotional abuse and torture suffered at the hands of others. Charlie Howard had been abused and mocked. He was made fun of and eventually killed. The violence that we see imaged in this poem is some of the same violence Mr. Hamill is speaking about in his essay. I can see the correlations, and I can see what both men felt like as they were being tortured. This essay was definitely eye opening and heart touching. I probably will never forget it for the rest of my life.

Explanation:

So this was also another great post from the time we did poetry of witness. I was proud of myself for this one too because I conquered another challenge. Mr Hamill wrote a great piece of work and I was happy that I got to read it and analyze it for what I thought it was saying!

Reflection Video!

Visual Presentation, My thoughts on Sean Huze and Tim O'Brien

The Insane "Live" Essay!

Comparing and Contrasting Sean Huze and Tim O’Brien

(The first two links listed are a short biography on both the lives of Sean Huze and Tim O'Brien... enjoy!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_O%27Brien_%28author%29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Huze


“What could be closer to playing God than ending another’s life” (Huze, 17)? The idea is to find out more about the effects killing another human being has on soldiers, and this is a great quote to open up such a topic. The point is to find out more by comparing and contrasting The Man I Killed and Ambush which are two short stories that tell one tale and they are found in the novel, The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien, and the monologue of Cpl Rodriguez found in the play The Sandstorm by Sean Huze. Both of these pieces are dynamic works of art, and both open up on what the effects are on a person after they kill another human being.

In The Sandstorm by Sean Huze, the character Corporal Rodriguez discusses just one of many emotions a soldier has after ending the life of another human being. It is a feeling of having no feeling. An example is found in a quote by Rodriguez: “…I searched for my soul for how I felt about the death that I brought that day. Searched for some sort of human feeling of regret or compassion. Searched and searched and came up with nothing” (Huze, 17). After killing so many people, one can’t imagine how it might feel after awhile. With so much destruction and so much death day after day, one could see how easily the feeling of compassion could become nullified. This feeling of numbness could also be described as a feeling of disbelief. The mind literally will deny that it is killing anyone, and that it is a job, so it fights off the compassion to make it easier, it moves on. On the other hand, there are other soldiers who could become speechless, who are filled with so much compassion or shock that they completely shut down.

(Sean Huze interview video, why he enlisted and what he got from it. Credit goes to YouTube user: GOODMagazine)

In O’Brien’s short story, The Man I Killed, we can see a direct example of a soldier shutting down. This can be seen in the text where the character that killed the enemy citizen solider sits staring at the dead body whilst the other character keeps trying to talk to him, asking him questions, trying to get him to snap out of it. He asks questions like, “You want to trade places with him? Turn it all upside down – you want that? I mean, be honest” (O’Brien, 120). The character Kiowa is trying to get the soldier to snap out of the complete loss of words and state of shock he is in. He is trying anything to get him to come to terms with his kill. This is both a comparison and a contrast; both soldiers felt the emptiness, both searched themselves that day, but one moved on and the other couldn’t right away. It took him some time, and it held up his company from moving on to the next objective. By comparing these two texts one can just start to see the start of the effects. First may come a feeling of emptiness but for some the feeling dissipates just as fast as it comes and for others it haunts them the rest of their lives.

(A video that includes a pictures that tells the story of The Man I Killed by Tim O'Brien Credit goes to YouTube user: sgunn007)

(A well made video using quotes from They Things They Carried by Tim O'Brien. Credit goes to YouTube user: BooksInspiringFilm)


The feeling that a soldier gets while in the middle of killing another, is also pretty similar as well as different in its respective ways. Both seem to run off adrenaline at the time of committing the act, yet O’Brien’s character ends up regretting the decision, becoming filled with emotion and Huze’s character actually enjoys it. However, this doesn’t make the person who enjoyed it a sick person, because adrenaline can make the solider feel a lot of things that are not a his true feelings. It is all about the moment and his body adjusting to make him survive that moment. In the monologue there are a few quotes that emphasize these points. This first one deals with the actual emotion while in the act of killing: “The fear gave way to adrenaline and a part of me was actually enjoying it” (Huze, 17). This quote proves the point of adrenaline taking over the soldier’s entire body, releasing him of fear and trying to help him survive the moment, but this still doesn’t make the character a sick person. With so much adrenaline and fighting the character has lost all feeling, and because he has become desensitized, the fault can’t be placed on him. “Maybe the only casualties weren’t the ones lying dead on the streets of Nasirya. Maybe some of us are walking dead, soulless shells of the men we were” (Huze, 17). The quote gives the reader a glance into what the war has done; killing wreaks havoc upon the soul both while it’s happening and the after-effect. Clearly the man in O’Brien’s story didn’t move on right away, the adrenaline led to an immediate shell-shock effect. While fighting he too ran off adrenaline. Upon sight of his target his instincts told him to lob off a grenade. “…I felt my head go empty and then felt it fill up again. I had already thrown the grenade before telling myself to throw it” (O’Brien, 127). The fact is that soldiers have to act on impulse. Before they know if the target is threatening or not, they are trained in such a way that adrenaline takes over and the killing instincts kick in and it is afterwards that they feel either remorse or no remorse depending on the soldier’s personality.

(A video interview with Tim O'Brien. Credit goes to: BigThink Media)

http://bigthink.com/ideas/19620#ooid=NxZmpjMTp_d_s8Pfe4dZyNB8V12_VHqN

What happens to a soldier after the war, after the killing, after the destruction is a completely different matter. Both men in the different stories had different lives afterwards. The monologue is so vague with how the soldier lived his life out after the war; we are left with only a final quote from him, “Maybe some of us are walking dead, soulless shells of the men we were” (Huze, 17). The reader is left wondering if the character is living out his life now still as a walking dead with no emotion because of the war. However the reader does have a glimpse of how the character in O’Brien’s story turned out. In his short story, Ambush, which is a continuation of the short story, The Man I Killed, one reads at the end about how the soldier re-lives the moment he killed the man every so often. This is an example of how soldiers are haunted by memories of war which contributes to how they live out their lives post war. This quote gives a perfect understanding of the after-effects this character is now experiencing.

“Even now I haven’t finished sorting it out. Sometimes I forgive myself, other times I don’t. In the ordinary hours of life I try not to dwell on it, but now and then, when I am reading a newspaper or just sitting alone in a room, I’ll look up and see the young man step out of the morning fog. I’ll watch him walk toward me, his shoulders slightly stooped, his head cocked to the side, and he’ll pass within a few yards of me and suddenly smile at some secret thought and then continue up the trail to where it bends back into the fog” (O’Brien, 128).

The pain this particular soldier lives with now is unbearable. He never fully recovered, nor did he ever seem to be able to fully cope with killing like Cpl Rodriguez was able to do in Huze’s monologue. The traumatizing effects killing another human have on a soldier can be seen very clearly here. Some soldiers never recover, some go on to live normal lives, but every single one of them is affected by the trauma that comes from killing another human being.

(A short clip about PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder) and how one in five soldiers from Iraq will come back with it. Also, how they are treating it. Credit goes to YouTube user: CBS)

The differences that are found in these two literary texts as well as the similarities are clearly displayed. Both characters were soldiers, both were asked to kill, both put their lives on the line. However, both had different experiences before, during and after the kill. They both did what they had to do, and whether good or bad, the after-effects still present themselves to this day.

(A video Interview with Sean Huze about his movie roles and also his experience in the Marines/ Credit goes to YouTube user: seanhuze)



(Two links that provide an excerpt of an interview with an Iraq War Veteran and one with a Vietnam War Veteran.)

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/82362/interview_with_a_soldier_an_american.html

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/227420/an_interview_with_a_vietnam_veteran.html?cat=9


Works Cited

Huze, Sean. “The Sandstorm: Stories from the Front.” New York, New York:

Susan Schulman Literary Agency, 2004. Print.

O’Brien, Tim. “The Things They Carried. “ 1st Ed. New York, New York: Houghton

Mifflin, 2009. Print.